As someone else noted in a previous thread (regarding: e-mail messages held on the server until a person makes enough free space in their mail db), in the Notes documentation it says that:
“After a configured interval, the Router tries to deliver the message” and “Messages that cannot be delivered before the configured expiration time (default = 1 day) are returned…”
However, THERE DOESN’T SEEM TO BE AN INTERVAL FIELD FOR ATTEMPTING RE-DELIVERY OF HELD MESSAGES! (The expiration time is configured via the ‘MailTimeoutMinutes=’ parameter in Notes.ini).
Since this field is missing and I can’t be sure that delivery of the message will occur within a satisfactory period of time (10 to 15 minutes), I’ve enabled the setting ‘Attempt delivery of each message’ so that e-mail held on the server will definitely deliver as soon as enough free space is made in the destination database. This seems to work incorrectly though:
I have a mail file with a 20MB quota, a 19MB warning threshold, and 7MB of free space (13MB used). The user is sent a 12MB e-mail, which should be held on the server until an additional 5MB of free space is made and the used space is reduced to 8 (or perhaps 7) MB. Instead, THE SYSTEM TRIES TO DELIVER THE MESSAGE AND FAILS, resulting in a partial delivery that just serves to further reduce the user’s free space (the amount of used space increases to 18MB before the system realises that there is not enough space and gives the ‘message could not be delivered, over quota warning message’). Other smaller messages that could have been delivered when the amount of used space in the mail db was only 13MB (a 5MB message, for instance) will no longer be delivered, of course. It seems that the test for sufficient free space in the mail file is failing, and the system does try to deliver messages that are too large.
Does anyone know how to set the ‘attempt re-delivery of held messages’ interval, and/or stop the ‘Attempt delivery of each message’ from partially delivering but in the end failing to deliver messages? Could this be a bug, or is it more likely to be a configuration issue?
Thanks,
Paul.