RFC 2183: is Notes compliant?

I want to understand if Notes is in compliance with RFC 2183.RFC 2183 - Communicating Presentation Information in Internet Me (RFC2183)

Quote: “The presence of the filename parameter does not force an implementation to write the entity to a separate file. It is perfectly acceptable for implementations to leave the entity as part of the normal mail stream unless the user requests otherwise. As a consequence, the parameter may be used on any MIME entity, even `inline’ ones. These will not normally be written to files, but the parameter could be used to provide a filename if the receiving user should choose to write the part to a file.”

In other words: even if a file has been included in an email with

Content-disposition: inline

Notes ought to allow the user to save that file to disk.

As far as I can tell, this is not possible with text or HTML documents. Am I wrong?

Comment: many email clients set content disposition to inline for included text and HTML files, so this issue is not abstract.

Subject: RFC 2183: is Notes compliant?

you are correct – notes does not allow one to save a message’s text/plain or text/html part to a separate file.

the rfc2183 passage you quoted is really descriptive, not prescriptive. the rfc suggests that if the recipient chooses to write the part to a file, then the filename parameter value could be used as the resultant file’s name. it does not say that the mail user agent (MUA) MUST provide this feature. however, i’ll concede that, as written, the rfc clearly expects that MUAs have this feature. <-8

i’ll ‘ask around’ to find out if there is any feature like this planned for future releases. if i get a definitive answer, i’ll post it here.

pwl

ibm m&c

Subject: RE: RFC 2183: is Notes compliant?

as written, the rfc clearly expects that MUAs have this feature. <-8 > i’ll ‘ask around’ to find out if there is any feature like this planned for future releases.

if i get a definitive answer, i’ll post it here.

Thanks! I would like to add that lack of this feature is a real impediment to normal work flow. It came to my attention when staff were unable to save HTML files to disk, as they needed to. (As you probably know, it is a fairly standard practice for email clients to include text and HTML files with content disposition set to inline. As far as I know, Notes is the only client that breaks access to the file in this case.) Perhaps you could mention this.

Subject: RE: RFC 2183: is Notes compliant?

at the present time there are no plans to provide this feature.

pwl

ibm m&c

Subject: RE: RFC 2183: is Notes compliant?

Can you provide any sense of why this industrystandard functionality will not be provided?

It just cannot be that hard!

Many of my colleagues have had to move to

other email clients in order to get this

functionality. (So obviously the Notes

server is not breaking the attachments;

it is happening elsewhere.)

This is an important interference

with workflow.

Alan G Isaac

Subject: We have a pseudo-product that does this. Would you be interested?

Contact me at Ben@GeniiSoft.com