MQ and LotusScript: LS2J+Java classes VS ActiveX library

HCL Domino Domino Forum
1

I have been doing some research on the various ways of connecting to MQ using LS.

MQLSX - no longer supported

LS2J + Java Classes - recommended by IBM

MQAX (ActiveX) library - ??

Altough IBM suggests using LS2J + Java Classes, it seems like it would be much simpler to just use ActiveX…mainly because:

  • no need to update notes.ini with classpath on user PCs

  • can access objects directly without LS2J interfaces

Has anyone used the activeX api before and are there any reasons not to?

2

Subject: MQ and LotusScript: LS2J+Java classes VS ActiveX library

As long as you can ensure that you always use MS based OS it should not be a problem.

3

Subject: MQ and LotusScript: LS2J+Java classes VS ActiveX library

LS2J works, but you still will need to create your Java wrappers.

Here is some code I wrote using Java to read msgs/write msgs/and even clear all msgs out of a queue:

http://dominodev.blogspot.com/2009/11/analyzing-websphere-message-queue.html