First I want to make sure , this is not a blast email, so don’t take it that way.
I see here at notes.net that 6.0.2cf1 is still in the stage 1 portion “due in the later” part of , but yet it is available for download from passport.
My question(s) is it supported now that it is on the passport site? Is it stable enough to use? I know test it right, but testing only gets you so far, something always happens in the real world.
I would be interested in knowing what problems are in the 6.02cf1 download that has already been found.
Thanks
Subject: Is 6.0.2cf1 safe to implement
Took the plunge myself. Only issue is with Single copy template on the new inotes. Run as a regular template no problem. Single copy gets cannot update UNID on a convert. I have an open case with IBM on this and the tech reproduced it in his testing. Looks like an spr.
Subject: RE: Is 6.0.2cf1 safe to implement
I experienced this as well, I have an open incident on it. Care to share incident numbers? Maybe we can get some headway.
Subject: RE: Is 6.0.2cf1 safe to implement
Just emailed it to you. Please send your Incident number back so I can work it from my end.
Subject: RE: Is 6.0.2cf1 safe to implement
Are you saying …
So long as I don’t modify inotes6.ntf and check the “single copy template” option in the database properties, then iNotes is just fine in 6.0.2 CF1 ?
Subject: RE: Is 6.0.2cf1 safe to implement
In our shop as long as I do not use single copy on the inotes60.ntf yes it works fine. Just loose that space saver. So far all I have discovered and the support engineer at lotus.
Subject: RE: Is 6.0.2cf1 safe to implement
Same here, if you don’t use SCT all seems to work just fine. We are also testing a few nagging problems with corruption that are supposed to be fixed in 6.02CF1 to see if they are corrected.
Subject: RE: Is 6.0.2cf1 safe to implement
Any update on your end from support? My support guy was supposed to get with yours on this issue.
Subject: Is 6.0.2cf1 safe to implement
I’m running it on two test servers and two production servers with no issues at all.
Jeff Dayton, PCLP, CLI
Subject: RE: Is 6.0.2cf1 safe to implement
LDD is running it too.
Subject: Is 6.0.2cf1 safe to implement
We upgraded our Administration server and development (test) server from 6.01CF2 to 6.02CF1 last night and no problems thus far.
Subject: Is 6.0.2cf1 safe to implement
We migrated our company from 5.0.12 to 6.0.2 CF1, all Windows2000 servers. No problems so far.