Default lines to display in a view

We are running into trouble with a Dom app that we have migrated from 5.0.11 to 6.0. In 5.0.11 when we open a view via the web browser it displays the entire view on one page (how we want it). When we moved to six it reduced the number of lines it displayed to 30. We changed the default value in the site configuration document to 300 and have rebooted the server to no effect. There is no default set in app itself and we are not using urls to designate the number of lines to display.

Any hints?

Tim

Subject: Server doc setting (2)

there are TWO settings in the server doc… on the tab for Domino WEB Engine.

Default lines per view page: 30

Maximum lines per view page: 1000

The 2nd one may be your problem.

Ruth

Subject: RE: Server doc setting (2)

I know, I tried setting it to “0”, which according to the documentation sets the default to no upper limit. It made no difference.

Tim

Subject: RE: Server doc setting (2)

Hi,

Did you ever find the solution to this?

I have come across the same problem today and found that the only workaround is to change the HTTP_DefViewRows field in the server document. This field in the server document is hidden because we are using Internet Site documents and setting the field in the Internet Site document has no effect.

The only way to change the field in the server document was to “hack it” with an agent. Not a very good work around especially when we deliver the app and config documentation to our client!

An obvious bug which needs to be resolved.

Michael

Subject: RE: Server doc setting (2)

It looks like the solution is to set the “use internet site documents” field to DISABLED and then go to the Internet Protocol/Domino Web Engine tab and the old fields will show up. Make your changes and then set the “use internet site documents” field back to enabled, save and close and then restart HTTP (tell http quit/load http). That seemed to work for us. This does seem to be a major bug. Hope IBM takes notice and fixes this…

Wendall Mosemann

Subject: RE: Server doc setting (2)

Forgot to mention that the prior post was in reference to the server document…