Code disapearing - Lotusscript & @Functions

We are having issues of code disapearing when you save it.

When editing an agent I would be down towards the bottom of the script and select file save. My cursor would jump to the top of the script and when I scroll back down some lines would now be missing. The lines that were deleted were sometimes the new lines and sometimes lines above the new lines.

A few of our developers are running into this. It seems to go in phases, some days are good and some are bad. Rebooting fixes it, sometimes for a short time and other times for the day.

Anyone have any thoughts?

Subject: Code disapearing - Lotusscript & @Functions

I know it doesn’t help, but I’m getting exactly the same problem - very annoying - and we’re not alone:

http://www-10.lotus.com/ldd/nd6forum.nsf/55c38d716d632d9b8525689b005ba1c0/ec53ce16cfc6a35b85256d250064adfa?OpenDocument

http://www-10.lotus.com/ldd/nd6forum.nsf/55c38d716d632d9b8525689b005ba1c0/cb2c981770471c5385256c4d0042e463?OpenDocument

Hoping this is fixed in 6.03 :frowning:

Subject: PLEASE search first (WAS: Code disapearing - Lotusscript & @Functions)

Anyone have any thoughts?

Plenty of people. It’s a known issue, and gets discussed every week.

Subject: I have searched a few times before today - If I knew how to spell disappear I would have found it!

Subject: LOL! (WAS: I have searched a few times before today - If I knew how to spell disappear I would have found it!)

I believe Lotus are trying to reproduce the bug on a consistent basis, and this is where they’re having trouble. So, I imagine that any details (environment, context, what software was running, etc., etc.,) that you can provide in a bug report would be really useful!

Subject: Is there an SPR # for this?

Anyone know if there’s an SPR # for this? I can’t seem to find it mentioned in the support databases, but I may not be looking for the right terms…

Thanks!

Stephanie

Subject: Yes (WAS: Is there an SPR # for this?)

SPR#DBRO4N7MDD. Also, Lotus think they’ve fixed it, possibly for inclusion in 6.5.1 / 6.0.4.

See →

Subject: Huzzah! Thanks for the info!