Hello all.I’m currently using the C++ API to change design elements such as forms as views (in fact I change textual parts such as literals and columntitles). Because I went into trouble when changing Form and View actions using the C++ API I switched over to the raw C API for them. So far no problem. But after I ran my programmatic design change and open a changed form, every access to any action in this form is very slow. However, the action is displayed correctly afterwards in designer. If I close all open Notes Applications and open them again, access is as fast as usual. Why could this happen? Maybe any object not correctly deallocated by my program?
have a look at your changed forms in notes-peek, but if you’d done anything wrong you’ll rather get a nice crash than performance problems.
But after I ran my programmatic design change and open a changed form…
do you open a doc using this form in client or displaying this form in designer? opening a doc in client could be slower, cause form isn’t cached yet.
but again: do changes on a small form once manually, store it (copy form). do it again using capi and compare all fields using notes-peek, you should be able to see any differences.
Thanks for your fast response, I did it in the designer. Using NotesPeek I havent found any differences so far… But even worse, If I copy a form from one database to another, using C++ API, which contains at least one action (and I do not modify anything but the $Language item), if I doubleclick on an Action in designer of the newly created form, it takes very long to show the properties pane (even if I close and reoopen Notes). In Notespeek I don’t see any relevant differences. I guess I’ll have to compare raw hexdumps of both Notes
